The latest instalment in the ongoing saga of DJ magazine’s annual Top 100 DJs list comes via anonymous blogger EDM Snob.

The mysterious blog purportedly reveals “secret payments” from management companies representing artists including Ferry Corsten, Paul Van Dyk and Erick Morillo. The implication is that these payments prove that artists purchased positive editorial coverage, effectively ensuring higher placements in the magazine’s annual Top 100 DJs poll. DJ Mag refutes the claims, arguing that the payments were for “legitimate advertising and CD covermount deals”.

All of which amounts to very little more than a nice bit of free publicity for the nauseatingly named EDM Snob and, by extension, the DJ Mag poll itself.

The row is just the latest in a long line of stories concerning subterfuge and scandal in the poll. Over the last few weeks, the magazine has reported that DJs are being “evicted” from the poll for cheating and that a scam in which votes were apparently sold via eBay has been foiled.

Aside from the fact that it would be naive to believe that any print magazine’s editorial content is completely impartial and uninfluenced by ad sales, it’s unlikely that positive coverage in the magazine would necessarily equate to success in the poll. Even if readers were easily swayed by editorial coverage, the number of people voting in the poll massively exceeds the magazine’s readership. It wouldn’t be at all surprising if a significant proportion of voters had never even picked up a copy of the magazine.

All the fuss about the Top 100 is becoming rather tiresome. Arguments about cheating, campaigning for votes and, inevitably, the final results have become more newsworthy than the poll itself. What began 15 years ago as a light-hearted annual feature has grown into a monstrous popularity contest. Do the results really reflect which DJs are best, whatever that means? No. They probably never really did. But these stories only really serve to turn the whole affair into a soap opera. Can that really be a good thing for the credibility of the dance music scene?

15th August, 2012

Comments

  • >Can that really be a good thing for the credibility of the dance music scene?

    Of course not, that’s why I stopped reading DJ Mag, Mixmag and Pulseradio et al when they insist on peddling inane articles stirring their own pot of faux-drama fuelled drivel.

    Please don’t go that route!

    Report
  • Can’t think of a single anonymous blogger I respect. Even Assange had the balls to reveal himself (if not the balls to leave the Ecuadorian embassy).

    Report
  • The Top 100 is irrelevant to anyone who knows anything about dance music.

    Report
  • I had two ambitions when I started out: to create music that moved me (and others). And to maybe make some cash out of it sometime. I can categorically state that none of my ambitions were to appear on a banal list of pay-for-placement DJs.

    Report
  • dj poll is like relying on a crritics review for your opinions.
    Unless you check it out yourself, how will you know?

    Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You currently have an ad blocker installed

Attack Magazine is funded by advertising revenue. To help support our original content, please consider whitelisting Attack in your ad blocker software.

Find out how

x

    A WEEKLY SELECTION OF OUR BEST ARTICLES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX